Ceasefire Row: GPRN/NSCN (N Kitovi) Rejects ‘Unification’ Claim, Says Centre Recognises Only NK Faction

The recent extension of the ceasefire agreement between the Government of India and GPRN/NSCN (N Kitovi) has led to a fresh controversy over nomenclature, with Ceasefire Supervisory Board supervisor G. Naga clarifying that the agreement was signed strictly under the banner of GPRN/NSCN (NK). Speaking to reporters after arriving at Dimapur airport following the April 10 signing in New Delhi, G. Naga said that the Government of India recognises only GPRN/NSCN (NK) and not any group operating under the “NSCN Unification” name. His statement came after the group identifying itself as GPRN/NSCN (Unification), led by Alezo Venuh and Neokpao Konyak, claimed that the ceasefire extension was signed under a unified banner.

G. Naga said there had been a prior understanding with a representative of the NSCN-U group to avoid public statements that could create confusion. He expressed disappointment over the claim, calling it a breach of trust. “We were invited as GPRN/NSCN (NK), just as last year. The Government of India recognises this leadership. There is no separate ‘unification’ entity in their records,” he said. He also mentioned that the group had urged the Centre not to introduce parallel names, warning that such steps could create complications by suggesting multiple leadership structures. On the talks held in New Delhi, G. Naga said discussions went beyond the routine extension of ceasefire and included detailed meetings with officials of the Ministry of Home Affairs and intelligence agencies. He said the focus has now shifted towards reaching a final political settlement.

“The ceasefire is already settled. The time is ripe for a solution,” he said, adding that there is growing support from tribal bodies, church organisations and the younger generation for an early Indo-Naga political settlement.He also dismissed the idea that complete unity among Naga political groups must come before any agreement, stating that differences exist but there is still a broad understanding on the main political issue. Meanwhile, member of the collective leadership C. Singson said the delegation’s visit to Delhi was mainly for the ceasefire extension, although wider discussions were also held.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *